Disputing: U.S. Supreme Court Decides CompuCredit v. Greenwood

By Don Philbin, January 13, 2012   
This post has been viewed 1,734 times.

 

Disputing: U.S. Supreme Court Decides CompuCredit v. Greenwood www.karlbayer.com/blog/?p=17230

Read original article


Tags:




Related Posts

Five Things You Didn’t Know about Arbitration
May 8, 2014

Arbitration is by no means a new option for resolving disputes. Yet, parties and their counsel may not be aware of everything...


ADR Prof Mount Rushmore
March 23, 2014

There’s recently been a lot of discussion of who should be on the “Mount Rushmore” of sports which has resulted in lots...


CPR Awards: Paul Lurie, Nancy Rogers, Jim Stark, Doug Frenkel and More
February 25, 2014

The International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution (CPR), an independent nonprofit comprising global corporations,...


 


1 Comment

Brian Blakeley

One practical problem with the strict enforcement of arbitration agreements under consumer protection statutes like CROA is the fact that it tends to blunt the development of controlling precedent. This, in turn, leaves arbitrators with unfettered leeway to accept almost any ridiculous interpretation of the statute that coincides with their particular prejudices.

Reply



What do you think?

Discussion is central to our goals at ADR Toolbox. If you have a minute, please share your thoughts on the article above and contribute to the conversation.





 

«
»






 
Menu Title
Bitnami